Energy Trust of Oregon wants about 20 online lessons and someone to keep the learning system working. Its $300,000 ceiling covers the courses and an initial two-year contract.
The lesson people see depends on the work behind the screen. AI-generated illustration; not a photograph of this project.
Making a useful course is one job. Keeping it accessible, tracking progress and helping people use it is another. Energy Trust is asking for both.
Inside: twelve opportunities, from learning design to leadership, property advice, coaching and research. Some are contracts; others are lists of providers a buyer may hire later.
Inside the Energy Trust contract
The course is only the beginning.
Choose a stage to see the work behind the lessons.
Build lessons people can use.
What the buyer asks to see
Examples of training, assessments and learner materials, backed by the people who made them. The brief anticipates 20 modules; additional topics may follow.
Course setup and testing, accessibility and mobile use. Our advice: pair the course sample with a real example of setting up and running the learning system.
BUILD THE LESSONSShow training, assessment and learner-material examples, with the people who produced them.
LAUNCH THE WEBSITESet up and test the learning website, including accessibility and mobile use.
KEEP IT WORKINGTrack learners, provide support and resolve problems across the initial two-year term.
Our grouping of the requested work, not the buyer’s schedule or scoring formula. Questions and notice of plans to bid: 29 September. Final proposal: 30 October, 5 p.m. PDT.Read the official call ↗
THE ARKUS SIGNAL / CONTRACTSTHE OPPORTUNITIES / 02
NEW / Oregon buyer
Twenty lessons won’t run themselves
1 min read ·
Energy Trust of Oregon’s $300,000 ceiling covers about 20 online lessons and the system behind them. The initial contract runs from January 2027 through December 2028.
Energy Trust · LMS and instructional design
The lesson people see depends on the work behind the screen. AI-generated illustration; not a photograph of this project.
A well-made lesson still needs a working way to reach the learner. Energy Trust of Oregon is buying both: about 20 online lessons, usually 10 to 30 minutes long, and the setup and administration of the platform that delivers them. The courses must suit adults, be accessible and work on mobile devices.
The initial contract runs from January 2027 through December 2028, with a $300,000 ceiling. Applicants must show training examples and learner materials, the team’s résumés, a schedule, and a budget identifying the tasks and the people doing them.
The final proposal is due October 30 at 5 p.m. PDT. Questions and notice that you intend to bid are due September 29. There is already a question to raise: the public page points to an online form while the PDF describes email submission. Reporting instructions also differ. Energy Trust needs to confirm the instructions in writing; answers are scheduled for October 13.
Before you start
Course designers or consultants who can teach adults, make learning accessible and run the online system that delivers it. Questions and notice that you intend to bid are due September 29. The online form and PDF give different submission and reporting instructions; ask the buyer to confirm them in writing.
The finer details
The application asks for work samples, team résumés, a budget by task and person, a schedule, answers on inclusion, insurance details and any conflicts of interest. The reviewed documents did not provide numerical scoring weights. The $300,000 figure is a ceiling, not a promised payment.
The Port of Seattle wants to hear from about 2,600 employees, then put the findings to work. The public notice sets a $300,000 ceiling.
Port of Seattle · Employee engagement survey
A staff survey can bring overlooked experiences into view. AI-generated illustration; not a photograph of this project.
There is a familiar fate for an employee survey: people take the time to answer, a report appears, and the daily frustrations carry on. The Port of Seattle is seeking a consultant to do more with the answers. Its new call covers surveys for roughly 2,600 employees, analysis of what shapes their experience at work, and clear recommendations for managers and senior leaders.
The assignment also includes helping Port staff find ways to check whether later actions are making a difference. The Port’s listing describes work beginning in early 2027 and ending in late 2032. Its estimated range is $250,000 to $300,000; the public announcement states a $300,000 maximum.
Proposals close October 6. Confirm the time before planning a submission: the public announcement says noon, while the Port portal displayed 4 p.m. without naming a timezone during our review. Questions close September 18. A September 10 conference has already passed, and the notice does not say whether attendance was required. The next useful step is the official portal and clarification from the buyer, especially before investing in a proposal.
Before you start
Employee research teams who can design surveys, explain the findings to managers and help an organization check whether its response is working. Questions close September 18. Confirm the October 6 cutoff and whether the September 10 conference was compulsory. Sign in to register your interest and ask questions.
The finer details
VendorConnect identifies solicitation 00322918 as Open. It lists work from early 2027 through late 2032. The public Documents tab returned no records during this review, so the packet, scoring, insurance and precise submission route remain unverified. The notice encourages women- and minority-owned firms and small businesses to compete as prime contractors; it publishes no participation goal.
THE ARKUS SIGNAL / CONTRACTSTHE OPPORTUNITIES / 03
NEW SELECTION / United States federal market
The evidence work has its own front door.
2 min read ·
GSA's Program Evaluation Services Subgroup is a pre-vetted pool under MAS SIN 541611. Applicants must already hold that schedule contract, and membership guarantees no order.
GSA · Program Evaluation Services Subgroup
The subgroup is a qualification route into later competitions, not a contract award. Editorial graphic based on the cited official source.
Federal agencies buy rigorous program evaluation through many separate orders. GSA's subgroup gives qualified Multiple Award Schedule contractors a clearer route into that market under SIN 541611.
This is not an open bid for one project. A firm must already hold a MAS contract under SIN 541611, submit the subgroup application by email and demonstrate experience with outcome or impact evaluation. GSA reviews the written evidence and may ask the team to complete a scenario before approving the subgroup designation in eBuy.
Admission creates eligibility to see and compete for later requests for proposals, blanket purchase agreements and task orders. It does not guarantee an invitation, an order or revenue. GSA's estimate of more than $500 million in federal evaluation spending from fiscal years 2018 through 2025 describes the market, not the value of this opportunity.
Before you start
Small and large businesses that already hold a GSA Multiple Award Schedule contract under SIN 541611 and can document rigorous outcome or impact evaluation expertise. Review the current instructions, email the written application to GSA, complete any requested scenario and pass both reviews before adding the subgroup in eBuy.
The finer details
Federal agencies issue the later competitions. Subgroup approval does not guarantee work. GSA's spending estimate is market context rather than a contract value, and each later request for proposals, blanket purchase agreement or task order carries its own scope, eligibility and deadline.
Energy Trust’s annual business and leadership budget is shared across providers and services. Applications close September 18; a place on the list promises no assignments.
Energy Trust · Business & leadership list
A useful planning session leaves people with choices they can act on. AI-generated illustration; not a photograph of this project.
Energy Trust wants advisers it can turn to for questions about running a nonprofit: how it is led and overseen, leadership training, group discussions, strategy and business planning. It is building a list of firms for possible future work. Qualifications, experience, price and small-business status will help determine who makes that list.
The $200,000 annual budget covers multiple providers and services. A successful application puts a firm in consideration for assignments; it does not give that firm a share of the budget or promise what it will earn.
Applications close September 18 at 5 p.m., making this one of the nearest final deadlines in the edition. The document says “PST” even though daylight-saving time is in effect. The buyer needs to confirm the intended cutoff.
Before you start
Firms that help nonprofits with governance, leadership training, facilitated discussions, strategy and business planning. The buyer considers qualifications, experience, price and small-business status. Accepted firms join a list for possible future assignments; work is not guaranteed.
The finer details
The annual budget covers all services and providers on this list. It is not an amount available to each firm. The issuer labels the September deadline “PST,” although daylight-saving time is in effect. Confirm which cutoff it intends.
THE ARKUS SIGNAL / CONTRACTSTHE OPPORTUNITIES / 04
CLOSING SOON / Washington buyer
Bring your expertise. And your calendar.
1 min read ·
Longview wants executive and real-estate advice, generally on site one or two days a week. It anticipates about 40 to 50 hours weekly over an initial eight months.
Port of Longview · Executive & real-estate advice
Property advice takes the work beyond the meeting room. AI-generated illustration; not a photograph of this project.
For this Longview assignment, availability means time at the Port. The buyer generally expects the provider on site one or two days a week, with about 40 to 50 hours of work weekly over an initial eight months. It will consider alternative staffing proposals.
The work combines senior executive advice with real-estate expertise. It is separate from the organizational review, whose packet contains a conflicting bid number. No budget for this assignment appears in the reviewed materials.
Questions close September 14 at 5 p.m. Pacific. Proposals follow on September 24 at the same time. The scoring makes the time commitment count: 30 points for the team, 25 for the proposed approach, 25 for management and availability, and 20 for price.
Before you start
Providers who bring both senior executive judgment and relevant real-estate experience. This is a separate assignment from the Port’s organizational review. Questions close September 14 at 5 p.m. Pacific. The buyer expects an on-site presence, generally one or two days each week.
The finer details
The Port expects about 40 to 50 hours a week over an initial eight months, while allowing other staffing proposals. Scoring totals 100 points: team 30, proposed approach 25, management and availability 25, price 20. Real-estate expertise is part of the assignment, alongside executive advice.
For its organizational review, the Port assigns 40 points to the team, 30 to similar projects and 30 to price. Two comparable projects and three references are required.
Port of Longview · Organizational analysis
An organization can examine how its people work together. AI-generated illustration; not a photograph of this project.
The Port of Longview wants an outside view of how it is organized, how its leadership works and how it prepares people for future senior roles. It puts the people doing that review at the top of its scoring: 40 points for the team and 30 for similar projects. Applicants need at least two comparable projects and three references.
Proposals are due October 2 at 5 p.m. Pacific; questions close September 18 at the same time. No budget appears in the reviewed packet.
Before sending anything, the bid number needs clearing up. The listing and packet cover say 26-068-PSC, but parts of the packet say 26-066-PSC. The second number also belongs to a separate executive and real-estate assignment. The Port’s coordinator should confirm which reference applicants must use.
Before you start
Consultancies that advise on organizational structure, leadership and preparing people for future senior roles. Experience with public bodies or complex organizations is desirable. Questions close September 18 at 5 p.m. Pacific. Applicants need two similar projects and three references. The packet prints two different bid numbers.
The finer details
The listing and cover say 26-068-PSC; some internal headings and the legal advertisement say 26-066-PSC. Ask the coordinator which reference to use. Scoring totals 100 points: 40 for the team, 30 for similar projects and 30 for price.
THE ARKUS SIGNAL / CONTRACTSTHE OPPORTUNITIES / 05
STILL OPEN / Oregon buyer
A good listener, when work gets complicated
1 min read ·
Energy Trust is building a list for one-to-one employee coaching. It seeks coaches who understand nonprofit work and adapt to different cultural backgrounds. Assignments are not guaranteed.
Energy Trust · Developmental coaching pool
A quieter kind of work: time to listen, reflect and change. AI-generated illustration; not a photograph of this project.
The next assignment could begin with a single employee. Energy Trust is building a list of coaches for one-to-one work with people at different levels of its organization. It is asking who can help, rather than booking a fixed number of sessions.
Coaches need experience with a range of clients, familiarity with nonprofit organizations and a practice that responds to people’s cultural backgrounds. The selection considers experience, credentials, an interview, pricing, answers about inclusion and references.
Applications are being accepted on a rolling basis, with no fixed closing date published. Coaches must supply their rates. Acceptance means Energy Trust can consider them when work arises; it guarantees no assignment, referral or payment, and sets no amount of work or earnings.
Before you start
Coaches who adapt their practice to people’s cultural backgrounds, have worked with a range of clients and know nonprofit organizations. The buyer reviews experience, qualifications, interview, price, inclusion responses and references.
The finer details
The work is one-to-one coaching for employees at different levels of the organization. Acceptance puts a coach on the buyer’s list of possible providers. It does not promise assignments, referrals or payment.
Energy Trust lets applicants choose specific research areas. Work is typically assigned in tasks below $100,000, with no guaranteed assignments. Applications remain open through December 31.
Energy Trust · Planning, evaluation & research
Careful observation turns a general question into something that can be tested. AI-generated illustration; not a photograph of this project.
A researcher does not have to offer everything on Energy Trust’s list to apply. The buyer allows applications for individual areas of planning, evaluation and research. It is looking for people who work with interviews or numerical data, energy analysts and specialists who plan energy resources.
The application needs relevant work samples, three references, proposed staff and rates, and the required disclosures. Software vendors are outside this call. Diversity and supplier-program factors may influence who is chosen for a project, although the reviewed terms set out no fixed scoring bonus or certification requirement.
Applications are accepted through December 31 at 5 p.m. PST. Individual assignments are typically below $100,000, but joining the list does not guarantee work. The decision now is whether to put a particular research skill in front of this buyer.
Before you start
Researchers using interviews or numerical data, energy analysts and energy resource-planning specialists. Applicants can choose individual areas of work. Applications need relevant samples, three references, proposed people and rates, and required disclosures. The call is not intended for software vendors.
The finer details
Qualifications are accepted through December 31, 2026. Joining the list does not guarantee assignments. Diversity and supplier-program factors may affect which providers are chosen for a project; the reviewed call does not establish a fixed scoring bonus or certification requirement.
Seven original selections were checked September 13. The GSA evaluation subgroup replacement was checked September 16, and four additions follow, checked September 15. Calendar reminders identify missing or conflicting cutoff times. Shared budgets, rosters and provider lists do not guarantee work.
NEW ADDITION / Seattle, Washington
Seattle's roster is 96 doors, not one bid.
2 min read ·
Thirteen open solicitations qualify consultants for 96 specialties and projects up to $420,000. Each category asks for at least three completed projects.
City of Seattle · Consultant Roster
Each category is its own evidence decision. Editorial graphic based on the cited official source.
Seattle has turned its citywide consultant roster into 13 applications organized by specialization. A firm can choose the categories it can actually support, from project management and workplace consulting to technology and race-and-social-justice work.
Roster placement lets City departments consider the firm for projects valued at up to $420,000 without running a formal advertised competition. That is permission to be considered, not a contract or promised payment. Departments still decide whether, when and whom to call.
The practical test is specific: show at least three completed projects within each category selected. Applicants must register and subscribe in OpenGov, then respond to the matching roster solicitation. Small-business language conflicts across the City's own pages, so confirm the rule for the chosen category before submitting.
Before you start
Consultants that can document at least three completed projects within every category selected and provide a matching statement of qualifications or résumé. Create an OpenGov account, subscribe to the City, select the exact roster solicitation and start a draft response for each chosen category.
The finer details
The program spans 13 solicitations and 96 specialties. City pages conflict on whether all categories are small-business-only or whether some close to large firms after enough small firms qualify. Treat small-business status as category-specific and confirm it in the exact OpenGov solicitation.
The federal door stays open. The work comes later.
2 min read ·
OASIS+ Phase II keeps six professional-services vehicle solicitations open across 13 domains. A contract seat permits future task-order competition; it does not put money on the table by itself.
GSA · OASIS+ Phase II
A vehicle award creates eligibility to compete later, not revenue now. Editorial graphic based on the cited official source.
OASIS+ is not one federal bid. It is a group of six governmentwide professional-services vehicles, including Total Small Business, four certified socioeconomic routes and an unrestricted route. GSA is accepting proposals on a rolling basis.
The first job is not writing the proposal. It is proving that past projects meet the selected domain's value, relevance, recency and performance rules. Commercial work and subcontracts can qualify, and federal experience is optional rather than mandatory.
Winning a vehicle contract gives a firm the right to compete for later task orders. It guarantees neither work nor revenue, even though GSA places no ceiling on the master contract. Several newer domains are not yet available for ordering, which makes this a long-horizon qualification decision rather than an immediate pipeline promise.
Before you start
Businesses with active SAM.gov registration and qualifying past projects for a selected domain. Set-aside families require the corresponding SBA status or certification. Choose the correct contract family and domain, read the latest SAM.gov amendment, then complete the domain-specific self-score before preparing the proposal.
The finer details
Prime, subcontract and commercial projects can qualify, and federal experience is not mandatory. Average annual value thresholds differ by domain. GSA is accepting offers in 13 domains, but several newer domains are not yet available for ordering. Some SAM metadata shows January 11, 2027 while GSA's current page says there is no closing date; preserve the rolling label and recheck the exact notice.
Seven hundred seventy agencies, one qualifications file.
2 min read ·
MRSC's paid Consultant Roster places qualified firms into Washington public-agency search pools. Agencies send the opportunities, and membership guarantees none of them.
MRSC Rosters · Consultant Roster
Visibility in a roster is useful, but never a guarantee of work. Editorial graphic based on the cited official source.
MRSC Rosters gives Washington public agencies a shared place to find consultants by specialty and service area. A business chooses the agencies it wants to serve, selects the categories it performs and uploads a Statement of Qualifications.
The Consultant Roster is open year-round. Annual fees begin at $75 for a sole proprietor and $230 for a business with up to 30 Washington employees. Those figures buy roster membership, not a project, referral or award.
Applicants need a Washington UBI and, when applicable, workers' compensation and professional licensing. The category choices matter: an agency can only find a firm through the categories and agencies selected in its application. Each buyer may still impose its own requirements when real work appears.
Before you start
Businesses with a valid Washington UBI, workers' compensation coverage when they have employees, and professional licensing required for the selected work. Choose only the agencies and service categories the business will genuinely serve, prepare the Statement of Qualifications and name the contacts who should receive notices.
The finer details
MRSC says 770 agencies use the service. Opportunities are issued by those agencies, and membership does not ensure an invitation, selection or payment. Agency-specific responsibility and eligibility rules still apply.
UW's Alliance keeps its caregiver mentor pool open for experienced Washington foster caregivers. The work is ongoing, but the linked file carries a solicitation-number conflict.
University of Washington Alliance · Caregiver Mentor RFQ 22-0038
The work is built around lived caregiver experience, not generic consulting credentials. Editorial graphic based on the cited official source.
This is a training and support role where lived experience is the central qualification. The Alliance is building a pool of mentors who can help foster and kinship caregivers find local resources, navigate policy and manage the questions that arrive after placement.
The linked RFQ describes flexible work of roughly 10 to 25 hours each month, plus one mandatory team meeting. Applicants must be licensed Washington caregivers in good standing, bring at least five years of fostering experience and understand their local foster-care community.
UW says the opportunity remains open and responses are reviewed as received. A contract does not guarantee assignments. One detail needs resolving first: the live page calls this RFQ 22-0038, while the linked file says 22-0039 and carries an older initial term.
Before you start
Licensed Washington foster caregivers in good standing with five or more years of foster-care experience, Caregiver Core Training and strong local community knowledge. Provide the current foster-care license, training certificate or progress, two community references, the checklist and the written scenario response.
The finer details
The live page identifies RFQ 22-0038, while the linked English attachment is headed 22-0039. The file also carries an older initial term. Ask UW to confirm the governing number, current term, compensation and submission contacts before applying.
THE ARKUS SIGNAL / IDEAS & EXPERIMENTSBEYOND THE OPPORTUNITIES
Two heads need a method
Human judgment and AI can help each other. The useful question is how, and compared with what.
A person plus an AI system sounds like an upgrade. Sometimes it is. The plus sign is doing rather a lot of unpaid work.
In a 2024 review in Nature Human Behaviour, Michelle Vaccaro and colleagues examined 106 experiments that compared people working alone, AI working alone and the two working together. On average, the combined teams beat people working alone. They performed worse than whichever solo performer was better. Helping a person improve and producing the best result available are different achievements.
The kind of work mattered. When choosing among fixed options, the combined teams did worse than the stronger solo performer. Creating content looked more promising, but the evidence did not establish a clear win over the better solo result. The authors see scope for better collaboration, rather than a reason to abandon it.
This is a study of published experiments from January 2020 through June 2023, not a league table of today’s models. Differences between experiments, and the possibility that some results went unpublished, limit how widely its averages can be applied. A promising pattern still needs testing in the work you actually do.
Imagine a museum rewriting its visitor instructions. In this hypothetical test, a staff member drafts one version, an AI drafts another, and a person using AI makes a third. Visitors try the instructions without being told who wrote them. Compare whether people find their way, what errors remain and how much staff time each version takes. Agree on those measures before admiring the prose. If the combination wins, examine what each contributor did well. If it loses, changing the division of work may be more useful than adding another tool.
COMPARE THE SAME TASKPerson aloneUse the same measures for all three.
COMPARE THE SAME TASKAI aloneUse the same measures for all three.
COMPARE THE SAME TASKWorking togetherUse the same measures for all three.
Three choices. One useful nudge. There is no prize for sounding clever.
Mostly first answers? Run another test. Mostly second answers? Invite another voice. Mostly third answers? Plan the morning after. One of each? Put all three jobs in the plan.
A playful editorial prompt. Your answers stay in this browser.
THE ARKUS SIGNALTHE STRIP / THREE ORIGINAL VIEWPOINTS
Between the lines.
Three scenes, each sparked by an opportunity in this week’s editions.
THE ARKUS SIGNAL / LAST LOOKTHE PEOPLE BEHIND THE WORK
The work after the launch.
WATCH THE STORY / 24 SECONDS
THE ARKUS SIGNALCONTRACTS / 14 SEP 2026
A short guide to the lessons, learning website and support Energy Trust is buying. Silent, with on-screen captions. Photographs are generated illustrations.
Ideas deserve a fair hearing. Then a practical test.
Chandler LewisFounder · Managing DirectorWalter BenadofPartner · Global Markets and InvestmentsNadia LerougeDeputy Managing DirectorCloud (Yiyun) QiuPartner · Design and Innovation StrategyAarav GhaiResearch Analyst
Arkus Innovation Studios helps founders, investors and business teams decide what deserves their time and money, then put promising ideas to work. We examine ventures and products, compare competing opportunities and build practical AI systems. Curiosity gets an idea into the conversation. Evidence decides what happens next.
Our Startup Diagnostic takes a close look at one venture or product. The Portfolio Diagnostic compares several. An AI Workflow Roadmap starts with how a team actually works, identifies a task worth improving and produces a clear roadmap with a 30-60-90 day plan. Before setting that path, we check what data is available, where a person needs to review the result and what could prevent the tool from being useful.
The useful output is a clear recommendation: keep going, change course or stop. Each comes with reasoning the team can examine. An attractive idea deserves serious attention. It does not automatically deserve a larger budget.
If a contract here needs capabilities your team is assembling, send the public call and describe the part you can take on. Tell us where the team needs help. We can discuss Arkus leading as prime contractor or joining as a subcontractor responsible for an agreed part, where the buyer’s rules allow. The first conversation should leave us clearer about the work, the people needed and whether there is a sensible reason to team up.